Nobody Judges The Winners (but the losers are destroyed no matter what)

| by Truth Seeker |

One of the harshest realities of life is as follows:

If you win (no matter the means), you are praised.
If you lose (no matter the effort), you are ridiculed.

That’s the rule.
The unwritten law.

Imagine the following situation. One man tries really hard to achieve something (e.g., find a job). He sends 100s of CVs, contacts companies directly, etc., and eats rejection for breakfast, lunch, and dinner.

He prints his resume on whiter paper. Uses bigger fonts. Adds buzzwords like “team-player” and “results-driven” while sipping his fifth coffee of the day.

He rewrites that thing so many times it becomes a sad poem.

But there’s nothing—rejection after rejection. The process repeats itself for months or even years.

Eventually, he stops opening emails with hope—he opens them like someone defusing a bomb. Eyes half-closed. Bracing.

Another guy (with the same skillset) does the same but gets a job in a week. The second guy is loved and admired despite putting in a lot less effort. The first one is hated—even by himself.

And that’s the cruelest part. The self-hatred.

The way you begin to look in the mirror like you’re staring at your own executioner.

Ditto for relationships.

The “blue piller” shows up with flowers, with truth, with vulnerability, with the trembling honesty of a man who’s still foolish enough to believe in the dream…

And she picks the guy with the jawline and the emotional intelligence of a house plant.

Do you think I gain any “societal points” for going through a mountain of rejections?

No. It’s actually the opposite. If anything, people would see those experiences as a “loserdom certification”.

They don’t hand out medals for pain. They hand out mockery. Side-eyes. Pity wrapped in sarcasm.

“You’re just not trying hard enough,” they say—while you’re bleeding out from the trying.

You never get real points for attempts.
But you always get points for winning.

That’s the scoreboard.
No referee, no time-outs, just results.
No one remembers the guy who almost made it.
Almost isn’t sexy.
Almost doesn’t pay rent.

So, what are the conclusions that one can derive from the above?

Machiavelli Was Kinda Right

The goal kinda justifies the means. Not always, but usually.

Actually, more often than we’re comfortable admitting.

For example, even in 2025, the fake natty way works way better than the full natty brah.

Yes, we’re not as ignorant as we were in 2011, but the business niche is still viable.

Hell, it’s thriving. The grift got cleaner. The lies got smoother.

The audience? Still desperate. Desperate for hope, for shortcuts, for that impossible glow of someone who doesn’t just lift—but sells the illusion of effortlessness.

Actually, it’s even better because you don’t even have to be as big (meaning you can get away with smaller doses) and still fool people.

Why? In the past, most lifters believed that even Arnold was natural. No joke.
Today, it’s common knowledge that you can’t get his size naturally.

But if you’re just big enough—you’re golden.
You’re in the sweet spot.

Big enough to be admired. Small enough to deny. You nod, smile, say “hard work and chicken breasts,” and the crowd applauds.

So, if you get somewhat big via TRT (more like mild testosterone cycling), you can still increase your appeal in front of a muscle-chasing audience.

It’s showbiz now.
The barbell is a prop.
Your delts are marketing.

Meanwhile, some “pure natty” that wants to enter the fitness niche could be doing all the routines in the universe and measuring every single gram that enters their organism, and yet they will still have a smaller leverage.

He becomes a monk of macros.
A disciple of discipline.
Counting every calorie like it’s a mortal sin.
And no one gives a damn.

People are after the shiny package.
How it’s built is of lesser importance to them.

Good Deeds Are Forgotten If They Don’t Lead To “Gains”

No matter how good you are, eventually, people will start hating you if results aren’t on the table.

Virtue without results?
That’s just weakness in fancy clothing.

Ironically, they will start hating you precisely for your “virtues”.

Your kindness becomes cringe.
Your work ethic becomes pathetic.
Your loyalty becomes sad.

No one roots for the man who loses gracefully—they mock him for not being ruthless enough to win dirty.

It’s a bit like a boxing match.

You could be the better technician, cleaner fighter, all heart and honor—but if you’re the one bleeding on the mat while the crowd cheers the guy with the heavier fists?

You’re just a footnote.

Life Ain’t Fair

Let’s stop pretending life is fair.
Life’s not a board game.
It’s a bar brawl with no rules and no exits.
It’s a casino where the house always wins.
Some people are born in silk sheets. Some are born already in the red.

The game starts at different times, with different dice, and nobody gives a damn about evening the odds.

You can be wise, noble, thoughtful.
You can read the Stoics and breathe deeply.
You can light candles, write journals…аnd still get trampled by a loud idiot with luck in his pocket and zero shame in his heart.

Hard truth?

The world loves confidence over competence.
Swagger over soul.

And it’ll always choose loud over right.

The system rewards teeth, elbows, and thick skin.
Not tears. Not poetry. Not effort.
It doesn’t even know you’re bleeding.

The Ending is Weird At Best

Here’s where most stories lie to you.
They tie it all up at the end.
They offer some golden nugget of wisdom. Some redemptive arc.

Real life doesn’t give you that.
There’s no neat ending.
No moral.
Just another day, and then another, and then another.

You survive the losses.
You swallow the disappointments.
You walk past the praise you never got.
And you keep going.

Not because it all makes sense. But because you don’t have much of a choice.

.

No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.

22 comments

  1. Ahmed Salem

    We need another article on what I have learned from being rejected by 2000 plus women part 2. Part 1 had a lot of important insights. Thank you for your articles you have taught us a lot about life.

  2. Guille

    Good article…truths like fists!! !

    1. Truthsupporter

      Ironically what Machiavelli truly meant is the point of this article. He didn’t mean the ends justify the means. He meant that people are so taken by appearances that so long as the results are favorable (to them) they will simply ASSUME the ends justify the means. So he was 100% correct per the point of this article.

  3. Hoyos

    The same way stupid optimism is a problem, so is stupid cynicism.

    I can only speak for my corner of the Western world, but if you do the right thing you’re usually better off, USUALLY. It’s the “usually” that kills people, the 20% of the time, still significant, that the dirtbag seems to get away with everything.

    The guy who cheats his customers usually winds up not having any. I live next to a rich neighborhood, not crazy rich but water access three story house rich (boats not yachts) you know how those “dirtbags” make their money? Oil people. If they screw up or can’t actually do their jobs they don’t get rich because the oil doesn’t get out of the ground, refined into something useful, and then sent on its way, Don’t get yourself, oil money is not easy money, it involves danger, skill, and supreme organization. You can lie to men but you can’t lie on to an oil platform, the stuff is there or it isn’t, you can get it out or you can’t.

    I love you OP but you live in a land where a century of atheism has turned “everyone” into high IQ predatory animals of course it sucks. Also the internet is not a real place it’s optimized for confirmation bias. Dont get me wrong you say a lot of truth but not all truth is pain.

    1. John

      I always read these articles and always enjoy them, but I have to agree with most of your points, Hoyos. As for this article, I was under the impression that we all knew that life wasn’t fair at least by the time we got out of high school, just learning that through life experience. The most popular people in school are usually pretty well to do, athletically gifted, good looking folks. They don’t have to be the nicest people. They can even be straight up jerks. On the other hand, there might be a heavier set kid or a scrawny ugly kid that is the nicest most loyal person you’ll ever meet, but they’ll never get the accolades. This goes for both males and females, and it carries over through life, for the most part – although to a less severe degree.

      I have to wonder about the numerous rejections from women that the author speaks about. Is he rejecting women too? I mean, does he scroll past the “6” in the looks department to go for the “8” when he himself is a “6”? Can the same be said for numerous job rejections? Everyone’s going for the best job, but if someone’s been unemployed for a while, can you not find a job that pays the bills – even if you don’t particularly like that job? At least (hopefully) temporarily. I couldn’t find a job in my chosen field with a college degree. I worked in a distribution warehouse at night and made decent money, and eventually found another job that I didn’t want to do that paid pretty well and was first shift. I’m still there almost 20 years later. Whatever. Work is just an ends to a means for most of us. Just find something that pays “enough” and do it.

      I loved your point about the internet and 100 years of atheism. I grew up when internet dating was new, joked about, and almost taboo, although I tried my hand at it a few times. No one had a smart phone, and not that many people even had a cell phone. I think the internet has probably skewed people’s expectations on what an attractive woman (that the author would aspire to date) and what an attractive man (that we’d aspire to be by working out) actually is. Also, regarding atheism, one of the ten commandments refers to not coveting or being envious of someone else’s job, girlfriend, possessions, etc. Most people think that these commands were given because God, if you believe in Him, is hovering over us with a list of things that he wants us to do or not do, waiting for us to mess up. But in reality, I think these commands were given for our own protection. Who does being envious of what someone else has hurt? Only the person with the envy. There’s a lot to be said for being satisfied with what you have and what you are. Sure, always try to improve where you can, but be satisfied where you are.

      One last note, I didn’t marry until I was 27 and didn’t meet my wife until I was 25. I’d dated here and there, but mostly suffered rejection. If I did have a girlfriend, it was always short term and they’d move on to someone else. I really dwelt on it a lot. I was in a hurry to find someone. Looking back, I wish I would’ve just enjoyed where I was in life. Maybe do some solo traveling and other things that you can’t do when you have a wife, 2 kids, and more responsibilities instead of wasting time being anxious to find a girlfriend or pining away for lost love. Interestingly, I found my wife when I gave up looking for one. I got so emotionally tied up in the past experiences with women (or lack thereof) that I went to a Christian counselor. He suggested I started attending church, which I did. Another church started a “Christian singles night” and I though “what kind of nerds will go to that”, but reluctantly went to it. I don’t think it’s just happenstance that I found my wife there after I stopped focusing on myself as much.

      1. Jose

        As another guy who has been following (and overall enjoying) this blog for around a year or two, I’ve to agree with yours and Hoyos’s constructive criticism.

        While most of TruthSeeker’s articles hit the nail about certain taboo topics, I think he leans too much on an overly cynical and almost nihilistic perspective sometimes. I kind of get it though because I’ve been also through that kind of low spirits, and Truth himself has admitted to cope with depression.

        Hope your marriage is working out well even if you somewhat regret being in a hurry to do it. I haven’t married yet, but it is definitely something you have to take your time for and be careful about because of its deep implications. Personally, I doubt I will ever get married because I suck at dating and I think I’m unfit for it due to my personality and lifestyle (probably I would get tired of marriage life sooner than I expect), but who knows.

        1. John

          Thanks, Jose. I wouldn’t change a thing. My wife is a better person than I am.

          I suppose the only thing I’d change is my attitude and actions if I could go back in time to my pre-marriage self. I was always preoccupied with women and sex and I actually came to believe that those feelings were normal – somewhat thanks to the media and the culture we live in (US).

          1. Any Major Dude

            John, Jose and Hoyos – you guys are all right. I also think that Truth states things boldly to make his point, since one needs to come across as definitive to get away from the exceptions in life, which tend to fool the pollyanna types.

            As someone slightly older than you and also Christian, I can tell you that much of it is grass is greener, and even more of it is your particular situtaion with religion and culture. If you’re a traditional person with an older soul and you are very successful to boot, it’s going to be VERY hard for that compatibilty to come around that is going to be a harmonious marriage. Especially in the age of women being raised to do all sorts of things before choosing a man, which was the plan of the atheist parasite who got control. Think of the thousands of options most women have, vs the handful that any given guy has from age 25-35. And then they claim you’re too old at age 33 even in this society, though all of us are seeking early 20s women because the trade isn’t worth it, otherwise. All I can say is that once you’re 40 unless you meet a truly exceptional woman (for guys attraction and sex is #1 so this is near impossible), you realize actually how stupid things are in life and how if you didn’t get the girl at a young age, you basically weirdly did overcome the society fooling you. The kind of stuff the modern woman does, says, spends and concomitantly does NOT do for a man is unfathomable. But that’s why we’re entering the crisis period. I feel bad for most people, as they don’t see what’s coming in the next 10 years.

    2. Intu

      Well, there is a point, and it is that, it is known between the lines, and it is not clear in the underworld, perhaps in the conspiracy world: the United States is an experiment, a state created to destroy it, in addition to being the modern Babylon, the “New World Order” can be seen more clearly in that country than elsewhere, even the government’s decisions affect the whole world as it happens now with tariffs.

      It is all done artificially, also it is not from now or when the social media revolution began, IT ALL STARTED or even earlier with the 80s or even earlier, clear proof that they set everything up to have a profitable large-scale farm, where man is a mere livestock animal to be squeezed and masturbated, and the woman crushed and manhandled by agendas, and ultimately the destruction of the family unit and the destruction of biblical values, resulting in an atheistic, tired, frustrated society, without life, alienated, fragmented, and disoriented.

      It is no wonder that the author has only experienced hell, this world is cruel to those who have LIGHT, but benevolent to those who tune into its frequency (NPC).

      1. Any Major dude

        Very interesting Intu, I largely agree. I have my theories here and elsewhere, but I can’t post as much in detail for various reasons and it’s not as pressing, as this is Truth’s site anyway. See above? What’s coming (soon, 5-10) as far as the plan is concerned will be shocking to the NPC, is all I’ll say for now.

        1. Intu

          Damn, add AI now, not because of its fever, but because of the idiocy of most fanatics aspiring to be multimillionaire CEOs (Loud laughter), and that this also affects companies, not because AI replaces people, but because it automates, and it can get to the point that 1 trained person, controls and does with various automated programs or robots, what would be done with an army of employees.

          It sounds very reductionist, but the issue is always money, in this case greedy efficiency at the expense of the enslaved life of the average employee, and it is worse if you are a man, hence the majority must URGENTLY decide between:
          1 Heavy Physical Work
          2 Boring and Simple Physical Work
          3 Unfairly specialized work (Paid things, Connections with key people, A lot of money behind)
          4 Worked with a high scale of specialization (you should have started 10 years ago).

          This happens in a multitude of jobs, no matter what you do now, and all of them, without exception, are UNDERPAID for their rank, an engineer paid at the level of a recent technical school graduate.

          And it gets worse when you consider that the system and its agents will always demand 120% from you, even if, due to corruption in the system itself, you can only perform at 50% of your capacity, and that’s too much. They can’t tolerate being shown that everything is macabrely manipulated.

          I could go on, but this is the modern struggle, and no, the average NPC doesn’t see this, they just keep feeding on stupid motivational reels
          (I can confirm TruthSeeker’s opinion, there are more and more pseudo-motivational gurus, and “entrepreneurs”, coaches) thinking that one day (lol) they will achieve their dreams (sad), and if you mention reality to them, you are their sworn enemy.

          1. Jose

            I can see your point. For example, around 10 years ago I would say Software Development/Engineering (my craft) was a quite profitable and safe way of making a living, but nowadays the decline of work-life balance and job security has been alarming. Layoffs are running rampant and most interview processes to get a SW role are insane even for professionals with more than 5 years of experience in the industry. Even if you somehow make it into a well paying Big Tech company after a ridiculous and unhealthy amount of grind, there is no guarantee that your role won’t become redundant in the mid or long term (yearly random “purges” of thousands of employees under different excuses are becoming the new normal in the likes of Microsoft, Amazon and Meta).

            I dare to say that also other modern real life dystopias like China and India are a key part of the plans from that hypothetical New World Order. It is no coincidence to me that many people born or with bloodties to the elites of those cultures have been appointed CEOs of ultra powerful (and increasingly greedy and corrupt) corporations in the last few decades. Unfortunately, they are the new victors writing the new rules of our world.

  4. SamS

    Once again, this article hits the nail on the head. Due to circumstances, I’ve been job hunting for a while now. The market situation is bad — and getting worse — so I’ve grown somewhat used to rejection. But as the article says, I’m on the losing side.

    When I started applying, there were dozens of candidates for each position. Then it turned into hundreds. Now, it’s thousands. I know this for a fact, as I have connections on all sides — applicants, recruiters, hiring managers, and even employers struggling to find the right match.

    The harsh reality is, even if I give everything I’ve got, I might still be one of 4,999 people applying for the same job. In such a scenario, so many variables come into play that it’s largely out of my hands. People tell me, “just show your personality and stay confident,” but honestly, that advice feels detached from the reality.

    The most absurd — yet technically true — thing I’ve heard from experts is: “Yes, the situation is tough, but remember, someone always gets the job!” It’s true, but it’s still useless. A friend of mine works in recruiting and told me that even the exact time of day you submit your application can determine your fate. A few minutes could make the difference between being seen or skipped entirely.
    So yes, someone always wins — but that doesn’t necessarily mean they were the most capable, or the hardest working. Sometimes, they were just lucky enough to hit “send” at the right moment.

    1. Jose

      Sounds sadly (and eerily) similar to how the dating market works nowadays. Men would be the “job seekers” and women the “companies” overwhelmed by the incredible excess and accessibility of demand.

      Right now I still keep a job in IT with a decent salary for my country, but I’m aware of the tough situation in the job market within that industry (the interview processes of many companies are insane and almost like sadistic game shows now). I’m preparing myself for the likely scenario of a layoff and subsequent job hunting or freelancing.

      1. Leonardo

        This is a very accurate comment. You even see some of the same language in both job postings and online dating profiles: First a very insubstantial and frivolous introduction and then very a demanding list of must-haves: “Do not apply/respond unless…” Even some of the same concepts are used to describe both: online profile, favorites, ghosting, fake profiles, etc.

        Fortunately you can abstain from participating in the online dating market, but until you attain financial independence (which all men should make their priority) you cannot avoid what has become a soul-destroying experience. In the last couple of years AI has made it ever worse: Now not only are CVs being filtered by AI, now AI bots are conducting the interviews.

        Great example of the wonders of the digital dystopia we are now living in.

        1. Jose

          Exactly. Also, the temptation of giving up after many rejections and settling down with a bad deal is very strong in both.

          As you say, if you fully quit the dating market nowadays chances are you will do perfectly fine (as long as you don’t care about what people think or gossip for lacking a partner), but the same can’t be said about staying unemployed. The best you can do is to build enough reserves (savings, investments, etc) while you are employed to survive at least a few years without a stable source of income, and keep learning/improving skills so you can find a decent job (or other ways of earning money) as soon as possible if you lose your current one. The current outlook sucks, but falling into despair and doing nothing is the worst course of action.

    2. Hoyos

      You know, I heard a talk given by Bill Shepherd, the astronaut, a small conversational thing around a table. He asked if anybody in the room was trying to go into the astronaut program. He then said basically the most talented capable people in the world apply by the hundreds and being chosen can often boil down to pure luck, you applied at a specific moment where you had just the right mix that NASA needed. In other words he talked about the need for humility. This guy was an astronauts astronaut, a Navy SEAL before that, the resume of a comic book hero, if anyone could justify being cocky it’d be him, but he wasn’t that way at all.

  5. Gerry

    I often hear people coming out with these ridiculous comments nowadays as a form of coping. I really believe what they mean to say is something completely different.

    Examples of this are ‘the means do not justify the end’ This is usually said by people who lack ‘the means’ in the first place to achieve the end. I had an argument with someone at work when i suggested the junky who robbed my house should have his hands smashed with a mallet. This person had a problem with it as apparently i dont understand addiction (his drug habit) and insisted he needs help instead. I argued that he had plenty of opportunities to get help but refused, i also argued that the courts were complicit in his behaviour for repeatedly releasing him and in effect enbaling him. To cut a long story short i asked ‘how many houses could he rob without the use of his hands to which i got this ridiculous saying thrown back in my face. I would argue in this case that the end entriely justifies the means!

    Another would be ‘violence doesnt solve anything’ usually said by people who cannot use it as solution because they are not physically capable of it in the first place even if they wanted to use it. There are countless examples of violence solving things throughout history. Attempting to negotiate with the nazis didnt work only violence did! The far left in the UK naively believe that being nice to extremists will stop them from committing terrorist acts! They are too stupid to realise that appeasing them like this simply enables them and only makes the problem worse and ironically makes the lives of other groups they allegedly support worse as well ie their LGBTQP buddies who are regularly given free flying lessons from these people!

    One major factor i believe is critical in this day and age for success in males is height!. I find people react and behave very differently if the advice/information given to them is from people who are of tall stature. Over the years ive repeatedly worked in companies with clueless management who couldnt manage an orgy in a gay bar and i wondered how exactly they had managed to attain these positions in the first place i then realised every one of them i had the misfortune of working under was well over 6 foot.

    1. Chris the real man

      Ah, the good old controlled violence, you can always count on a mallet against the druggies! In my country there was a true hero, Chris, a patriotic real man who did almost exactly this. When he was on a holiday once, he stopped a group of men from raping a woman. He broke the hands of one of the guys and tamed the other dudes too. While doing it, he was stabbed in the ass, but he didn’t even notice it at first because he was a big dude, a true manager type, 6 ‘3 and 300 lbs.

      When he was later interviewed about the controlled violence and if he would use it again in a similar situation, he told the interviewer that he sure would. Then he was asked why and he answered that because he had never seen a guy rape a woman without hands. He also stated that if needed, he would break legs too.

      He had a tough upbringing. His father went to get milk when he was just a toddler and never came back. His mother was an alcoholic who wasn’t able to take care of him and his brother. He didn’t complain. He just wanted to tell people about that because he wanted them to know he was a self-made man.

      And that he was, he really lived many lives during his life. He worshipped Arnold and his career path was a bit similar too. Bodybuilding saved him from all other stupidities in life. He worked as a bouncer and collected enough money to move to America. Went to Golds gym, made a lot of money through show business, came back home and did some other sports and entertainment related stuff. And then he became a politician.

      He always remembered to talk passionately about feminism, gay people, black people, other politicians etc. Oh yeah, druggies too! In all interviews and TV shows he did he always remembered to tell people to stay out of drugs. He was also a real example because he admitted his steroid usage, but he started using them only after he had built his bicep to 20 inches naturally.

      As it goes on the Internet, conversations always at some point end up in Nazies. Like Adolf and Muhammad Ali (his big hero although black) he was also a great smack talker. Like the old song says, he knew that if he was a politician, he could prove that monkey talk. And he sure did that. He was able to touch the hearts of the real working class heroes. He talked about the needs of war veterans. He also talked about the groups of people who were using the society to live freely in his country. He once said that he doesn’t use public transportation because it’s only for druggies and crazy people and all the other foreigners in the country. Sure enough, he got elected by historical voting numbers. He had gone full circle, he was like his hero Arnold.

      After about a month as a politician, he once again decided to use controlled violence. This time he acted like Hitler’s zombinazies on pervitin. He combined the violence with weapons, drugs and alcohol. He was taken by the cops from his apartment because he had used an illegal gun while being under the influence of drugs. His girlfriend was at the apartment too and he fired a couple of shots to remind her about where she belongs when the management is around. In the past, he had also shown her that he didn’t really need a gun because he was a real man, he did it by chasing her with an axe.

      Chris, the man, the myth, the politician, was taken by cops and he was in a coma for three weeks. It led to permanent brain damage. Police found a lot of stuff from his apartment, including testosterone and anabolics and the gun of course. During the incident he was under the influence of alcohol and amphetamine.

      Long story short. He continued as a politician but on a permanent sick leave. Somehow he also managed to get liver cirrhosis, which must have been only bad luck because he wasn’t an alcoholic. He’s still achieved many things. Many of those have been told only after his great career. One of those was that as he was still a politician, he was able to get a very good sick pension. Later he was stopped by a police officer because he was endangering the traffic on the highway by driving from side to side mindlessly. He was under the influence of cocaine. Afterwards, he said in an interview that he only took a few lines and it shouldn’t have been in his system anymore.

      Because he was a self-made man, a great athlete and a great smack talker, he decided that he wasn’t going to let brain damage make life any more difficult. So he took a few pills and shot himself in the head with his other illegal gun. After all the years a lot of stuff has been released about him. He was actually a criminal before he left to the US as a young man. In the street, he was known as a pussy who always carried a gun because he was so afraid of everything, and he was very paranoid about things. He also had a drug, alcohol and steroid problem for all of his life and did a great business by selling all that stuff and by avoiding taxes through tax havens. The stories about his mother and father were complete bullshit. Many of his fights were staged. He also took advantage of women to chase his own great goals.

      A good thing to remember which he forgot to tell people is that when you break an arm of a drug user, remember that the druggies behaviour may be unexpected, depending on the drug. So If it happens to be something that numbs the pain and makes you aggressive, be ready to be a real man, a manager type of a guy, and finish the motherfucker entirely. Otherwise the druggie may continue to march forward even without arms. And as the war veterans tell, it seems that when you take someone’s life, it kind of sticks with you. So be sure to know what is worth killing too.

    2. Any Major Dude

      It’s a gynocentric society, and everything you state revolves around that maxim. It’s also a failing society, which is built into humanity – concerns based on feeling always lead to collapse. But truth considerations should also always be balanced by godly things, including virtue, discernment, patience, mercy, and endurance. Once we took survival for granted, indeed, we lost God and the godly parts of life, and tried to substitute food, drugs, distraction. The things that most easily attract women. And people wonder why we are lost — the built in population decline is coming, folks. Digital replacement.

  6. Facer

    A “few” times, the winner is arranged (competition,event, war ).
    There is no place for others. But when that happens, suddenly there are investigative committees and whatever.

    Going back to the example, I can imagine the employers setting a very limited number of jobs. No matter what, they’ll say no to most of them. I wonder who among them rejoices in seeing the applicants’ juggling, observing the similarities in their speeches, the desperation. And who among them is going through a desensitization process?

    Even some victories make such people worthy of great indulgence. “Yes, he took some roids, but his honesty…”

    About the rejections, I was such a delusional, almost mental illness. I thought I would unlock a secret skill for reaching a high number of rejections. You know, like when someone reasons wrongly that reaching 40kg biceps curl (one arm), only then, magically will get massive arms. (btw, one person s born with the unlocked skill to absorbs rejections and high energy or charisma, or don. Same with the arms)

    The end is a fckng messed void. Perhaps the universe breaks and bleed grotesquely, maybe the universe ends when someone stop living.
    (Ok, that was so obscure… life’s what you make It? sounds good to me)

  7. zazamafia

    I’ve been following your work and I admire the raw, no-bullshit style of your site. It’s exactly the kind of platform I want to build. I’m working on something explosive — I’ve connected the dots on several intelligence operations, technologies, and manipulation tactics. I want to go public, name names, show faces, and reveal the tools they use (mind control, surveillance tech, etc.).

    I have a few questions:

    1. How did you build your site technically?
    I want a simple but powerful platform like yours — no flashy design, just brutal truth. Did you use WordPress, Jekyll, or something custom? Any hosting provider you recommend that won’t censor me?

    2. Do you use VPN or Tor to manage your site/admin panel?
    Since I’m planning to expose dangerous material, I assume I’ll need digital protection. What’s your operational setup?

    3. Payments — how do you handle that?
    I want to include a donation option. What’s the safest way to accept donations (crypto? Monero?).

    4. Legal risks — especially jurisdiction-wise:
    I currently live in Tanzania, outside of Western legal reach. I want to publish names, faces, and direct accusations targeting people based in Europe, especially connected to intelligence and covert operations.
    Obviously this could be labeled as “defamation” under European law — but I’m counting on the fact that Tanzanian jurisdiction doesn’t care.
    What’s your take on this? How do you handle the legal buffer between your content and Western courts?
    Would you recommend any specific offshore hosting or legal shielding techniques to make it harder for them to touch me?

    I’m not interested in playing nice. I’m going all in. Any advice from your experience would be gold.

    Thanks in advance

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *