Men Are Not The Stronger Gender

| by Truth Seeker |

Many commonly accepted “facts” are true, but only when you reverse them. 😉

Examples:

Cereal is good for you.

Hard work always pays off.

You can get big naturally.

You create your own reality.

…and many other hallucinations that you see in anti-social media posts.

But today, I am going to talk about a big one, namely the LIE that “men are the stronger gender”.

Men Dominate Physically and Emotionally…..But….

The average woman would be lucky to bench press 40kg after a year.

The average man does it on his first training day for sets of 10, despite having spent the better part of a decade playing Call of Duty.

Men win when it comes to emotional strength, too. Women can show brutal emotional resilience, but men, on average, overcome much harder traumatic events while still preserving what’s left of their hearts.

Men face more rejections from the world, brutal loneliness, love scams, divorce-theft, societal slaps, and so on, yet they continue to push forward one way or another.

But if men are stronger emotionally and physically, why am I saying that men are not the stronger sex?

The most accurate way to measure overall gender “strength” is not the number of pull-ups you can do or the volume of rejections you can survive.

It’s societal leverage and action shaping.

Societal Leverage

Humans live in packs. Therefore, the main way to measure one’s strength is in a group context.

Measuring a man’s strength in isolation is akin to measuring one’s upper body strength via a wrist curl rather than a multijoint exercise.

And the brutal truth is that men in modern societies (not all countries) are just WEAK, to say the least, and play the role of servants who get the most pain for the smallest reward.

Here are some examples that paint how much “strength” a man has in a pack:

1/ The divorce laws in all European, Euro-based, and Euro-colonized states are against men. By default, the woman gets your child, 50% of your assets, and forces you to pay alimony even though you can barely see your kid?

Strenght? Not even once.

2/ Men face HARSHER punishments for the same CRIME. This alone shows how much society cares about you. A woman can do the same bad thing as you, and yet she faces fewer and smaller societal sanctions.

Enjoy your equality, brother.

3/ If a man hits a woman (not saying he should), society (including other men) will destroy him. But if a woman EMOTIONALLY leads a man TOWARDS SUICIDE or clinical depression that lasts decades, no one will say a word.

Why?

Emotional stress, unlike physical stress, is practically invisible and cannot be measured.

How do you measure the pain that a man faces after a rejection, a divorce, a separation from his kid(s)?

You simply can’t.

But just because you can’t measure something, it doesn’t disappear.

It’s a “spell”, a wicked one.

And if a man starts complaining and shares his pain, he will receive criticism from both other men and women.

“Just be a real man, bro.”

whereas an abused woman is sheltered immediately (if she wants to).

LEVERAGE LEVERAGE LEVERAGE

Your deadlift or fighting skills mean practically nothing outside of the ring.

An average girl who can barely open a water bottle on her own enjoys just as much, if not more, security than you (provided that she doesn’t do something retarded).

How so?

In Euro societies, each man is a potential bodyguard of every woman he meets. That’s how we’ve been conditioned to behave.

If another man attacks you on the street, most people won’t do anything.

If a man attacks a woman in public, the group of males around her will more than likely protect her due to societal conditioning and pressure not to be labeled as “cowards”.

There are exceptions, but they only prove the rule. Women are privileged to enjoy free protection from unknown males.

Meanwhile, if you try to look for a risky “service” that the average woman provides to the average unknown man for free, you will get error 404.

But of course, female leverage does not end with personal protection. It extends in every sphere of life.

Men fight the elements to build the entire infrastructure and maintain it 24/7 despite the stress, pain, and risks, while women and Andrew-Tates-wannabes enjoy it.

If the Internet of a girl leveraging her looks on social media for likes goes bad, she has to call a man who may have to survive a blizzard to fix the network so that she can enjoy her online dopamine sources.

The sad part? Men who do that are often invisible to the average woman. They are simply servants who are allowed to exist as long as they know their place.

Their work is not celebrated or even appreciated. And why would it be? Why would a queen care about what the slaves do?

War & Death

The war in Ukraine depicts perfectly how disposable average men are. There are many video clips of men being forcefully recruited into the army.

Imagine riding your bike while 5 other men come out of nowhere, surround you, grab your arms and legs, and force you to fight in some senseless war that you never wanted to be a part of.

This is “male privilege”. And even if you survive, what are you coming back to?

The sad part here is that other men are doing the dirty work once again. Those “recruiters” are playing the role of dogs for the elite. And if they don’t play it well, they will be punished too.

During World War I, women handed out white feathers to men not in uniform, receiving one meant just one thing: coward.

The idea was simple and cruel—shame him hard enough, and he’d march off to the trenches, into the mud, and blood.

Patriotism could wear lipstick and a pretty dress when it needs to. It didn’t matter if the man was sick, already wounded, or doing vital work at home—without a uniform, he was a target.

It’s a perfect example of how governments use women to pressure men into serving, dressing up manipulation as duty, for the so-called greater good.

MONEY

No matter how much money a man has, it always ends up in the hands of a woman sooner or later through carefully engineered societal pathways and emotional labyrinths.

Behind every rich man, a woman is spending his money with zero guilt.

Politicians in your country steal your tax money and give it to their formal or informal mistresses. They buy houses, expensive cars, and pay for their trips….with your money.

But even if the money is earned “honestly”, it still has the same fate—many stories of famous sports players getting owned by women via divorce.

As the saying goes, her money is her money, your money is “our/her money”.

It’s not a coincidence that the richest women in the world are either the wives or ex-wives of entrepreneurs or some celebrities. Nothing earns money like divorce.

BIRTH/OFFSPRING CONTROL

Who decides who’s going to procreate?

Aside from God and nature, it’s women rather than men.

A man cannot just wake up one day, decide that he wants to reproduce, hop on some app, and find a mother for his kid. Doesn’t work this way.

Why? Once again – leverage.

Women have leverage over men when it comes to kids because of the womb. The kid grows inside the woman, and that’s a distinct advantage (despite popular belief).

How so?

The woman is the first to know if a kid is on the way. This info could be hard to face, but at the same time, it offers a multitude of strategies ranging from somewhat acceptable to pure evil.

I know two women who hid their pregnancy from the fathers.

Why? They didn’t want a kid at the time. So, they exercised a form of eugenics, deciding whether a man would be a father or not.

They made a decision ALONE that wasn’t just theirs to make. But they used the womb-leverage and moved on.

That leverage is also used for strategic impregnation before hitting the so-called wall.

A woman can choose a few “hot men” to have sex with. Lie to them that she can’t have kids or that she is taking a pill, and hope for the best.

It’s not pretty. It’s not romantic. It’s not hot, but it’s an option.

Men don’t have that option. THEY MUST seduce a woman and satisfy her criteria or pay an obscene amount of money to a surrogate – money that most men don’t have.

But the advantages don’t end here.

A mother doesn’t need a DNA test (unless the babies are mixed at the hospital). She 100% knows that her children are hers.

A man? Well, plenty of stories of men learning that their adult kids are not theirs.

DATING

Forget 9-to-5 slavery….nothing is as exhausting as modern dating for a man. It feels like having a second or even a third job….except you are not getting paid.

Whether you are a 1/10 or an 8/10 man, the woman dictates the rules of dating today because the market has devalued the average man to nothing.

You read that correctly. Even 8/10 men get ghosted, owned, abused, etc. Even them.

So what do you think would happen to some 5/10 semi-austic romantic bro? Emotional horror.

The digital infrastructure, the promiscuous culture, the laws that are already against men, the stigma, the societal pressure, the unwritten rules, the governments subsidizing female dominations, and many other factors have made the dating scene essentially hell on earth for the average bro.

I don’t care about strategies such as dread game, late responses, “just be confident, bro,” or other beyond retarded mechanisms promoted by some bearded middle-aged men who allegedly have some secret code to success while being either divorced-destroyed, hiding in the closet, or behaving like beta bitches when the cameras ain’t rolling.

The free dating market has put everything on the shoulders of men.

Here’s the list…and it ain’t even the full one:

  • Initiate the interaction (potentially humiliate yourself and face 1000s of rejections)
  • Set the date
  • Carry the date
  • Pay for the date
  • Watch how you behave on the date – if she doesn’t like you, you’re back to DM spam city, the apps, and other humiliation pathways
  • Ask for another one (second initiation)
  • Plan the second date (must be “creative” and “fun” but not too try-hard)
  • Keep the conversation engaging 24/7 or risk “he’s boring” and ghosting
  • Show confidence but never arrogance, humility but never weakness
  • Be taller, fitter, and better dressed than the competition — but “not vain”
  • Protect her physically without ever looking aggressive
  • Earn more than her, but pretend money doesn’t matter to you
  • Always text first, but not “too much”
  • Remember every detail she tells you, or risk “you don’t listen.”
  • Navigate emotional swings without losing your composure.
  • Be exciting, but also “safe”
  • Be decisive, but also “open to her ideas”
  • Make her laugh without offending her
  • Never mention your struggles until she feels 100% “secure” with you — which may never happen
  • Constantly prove you’re “different” from all the other guys she’s dating or texting
  • Keep yourself in shape forever, because attraction is assumed to be your responsibility
  • Manage your feelings when she pulls away “to see if you’ll chase”
  • Compete in silence with her perfect man that exists only in her imagination.
  • Never stop improving yourself, because the minute you relax, you’re “losing effort”

….etc.

The man gives and gives energy, money, and emotional availability…

That’s fine. Somewhat natural…but it’s not appreciated enough. If she doesn’t feel you, she is taught to bounce.

Why?

The explanation is once again – the controllers hacked/reprogrammed women to control the narrative.

One thing that people often forget is that we are LIKE computers. I am not saying that we are machines, but our brains operate on a similar (organic, ofc) schema.

In short, we have code running in our brains. That code decides our behavior. Things that were crazy 40 years ago are now normal. That’s an example of that code being manipulated.

So, the controllers hacked women into thinking a certain way by manipulating some of their base desires and inherent traits. The results were a catalyzed destruction of the very things that built the so-called social fabric.

Red Pillers, MGTOWERs….Are ALL BETAS

Many naive souls out there do lots of gymnastics to repackage their servitude.

Well, repackaging doesn’t change the contents.

The so-called red pillers will tell you that you are simply a loser who needs to man up and follow some rules.

“Just approach, bro!”, “Hold frame!” and other bullshido.

The truth is this:

If you had any meaningful leverage, you wouldn’t even know what the game is. Your ancestors didn’t bother with “late responses” and other weak antics.

Your grandfather got married at 19 and found a girl 3km away from him on a random day. You, however, have to turn the Internet upside down to get a date with a female who isn’t too fat.

Why? No leverage. A different code.

The truth is that red pillers are simply clowns who try to become winners by copying the peripheral behavior of the so-called Chads.

Example: Chad doesn’t use emojis, proper grammar, and replies slowly. Low-IQ red-pill bro concludes that this is the secret to being alpha.

Well, this is akin to putting a “turbo” sticker on your car and expecting it to go faster. Chad’s behavior is a symptom of his great leverage – why bother putting in the effort when the success comes without it?

Mimicking his style doesn’t work.

His leverage comes from being super tall and super hot. That’s it. It’s not his words, his philosophical views, his behavior, his shoes, or the color of his T-shirt. It’s looks and money.

That said, Chads are also victims of the game.

But they are simply sitting at the end of the table where there’s more food.

Nonetheless, they are far from immune when it comes to societal leverage (e.g., divorce-destruction).

Chads are the toy that the kid wants…now.

MGTOWers and other forms of male movements are weak sauce… full of self-generated lies.

The only men who can call themselves MGTOW are those who would be living that lifestyle even if they could get women.

In other words, if you don’t have a choice, are you going your own way, or are you catapulted there?

A man who can easily get women rarely goes full MGTOW for long. A period here and there to work on a project? Sure. Forever? Hell no.

Never forget that the male sex drive is the strongest motivator on the planet.

Remove masturbation, and all those “MGTOWERers” would start making out with trees in the park. It’s just the reality of life.

Besides, what does it even mean to go “your own way”? Where are you going exactly?

You are still part of the economy somehow. You still buy and consume. You are still socializing one way or another.

Where are you going? To your lonely apartment where you slave to the screen, listening to yet another bearded “alpha” male teaching you how to look for red flags in a woman while secretly crying when the camera isn’t running?

Back to doom-scrolling your Instagram reels?

To a large extent, that’s the equivalent of cats and wine for men.

The difference? Many men are PUSHED to go “their way,” whereas most women who live the cats and wine lifestyle are guided by their manipulated hunger for non-stop upgrades.

Will You Marry Me?

You’ve seen the sad circus called proposing.

A dude gets on his knees, holding up a shiny little noose with a rock glued on it, looking up at her like she’s a queen in silk who might drop a scrap from her plate if he wags his tail hard enough.

It’s a joke, but nobody should be laughing.

The message is tattooed on your skull from birth: she’s above you, you’re the dog.

And the price tag? A few months’ pay and maybe a piece of your liver.

The whole scene stinks of submission.

But the most important part isn’t the unequal ritual – it’s the fact that it’s HER decision.

As always, the man is doing everything, and she is deciding whether he would be her clown.

This proves, unequivocally, that MGTOW theses such as “you are the prize” are total nonsense.

If you were the price, women would be chasing you and getting on their knees for you. But they are not doing so, except for a small minority of men. You have a higher chance of dying tomorrow from unexpected events than being a part of that minority.

Sex

Sex is a leverage….the strongest one….that women have against men.

We all know how it works, but let’s repeat the principle once again.

Men have a strong sex drive naturally (hormones).

Women control the access to the destination where the hormones are pushing you.

Women have a high sex drive too, BUT only for 10/10 men. Consequently, they can maintain a calm and calculated attitude towards the average dude.

This is somewhat natural and a protection mechanism. Women let their guard down for 10/10 men because it’s considered a “chance” to secure top genes.

But put their guard up for Mr. Average because his genes are well….average… and thus he needs to make up with other qualitie$$$$$.

Meanwhile, the average man’s impulses are amplified when scarcity is in order. In other words, you are lowering your criteria to free yourself from the hormones.

That increases the female leverage over you and makes you accessible to women that you would consider undesirable in the absence of hunger.

The result? Simping and other forms of self-humiliation and destruction.

“But if all men unite…..bro”

Many naive individuals believe that men are capable of uniting and “fixing” this.

Theoretically, yes. In reality? Keep waiting, baby.

That mentality is the equivalent of thinking that people can unite and destroy the evil politicians ruling them. Sounds nice on paper, but the landscape changes quickly once you activate a bit of brain.

The brutal truth is that men won’t be fixing anything. If the system changes, it will be due to its own expiration date rather than some miraculous unification of the virtuous male society.

Men will not unite because:

1/ it’s just difficult

2/ each man is in direct competition with the rest

It’s like the economy. Most people are poor (living paycheck to paycheck) but believe that they will be millionaires one day.

And those who see a bit more clearly don’t have the leverage to do anything.

But even if you could, what would you realistically do?

Change the moral code of 1 billion people?

Good luck with that.

No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.

41 comments

  1. Hitler

    Truth, have you ever watched any of LooksMaximus’ videos? I believe he died of leukemia brought on by his steroid use. He had a bit of an epiphany as a result if his diagnosis: his hatred softened, and he disavowed all but two of his many past videos. He was always dead against the redpillers and manosphere types, as he thought they were all grifters, taking advantage of “low value” males who had little hope, by feeding them bs PUA tier advice to secure a woman. He advocated for men instead to give up on relationships and modern women and fully embrace the use of prostitutes and steroids. Prostitutes to satisfy the sexual urge and steroids to reinvigorate the male spirit. He was openly nihilistic and hedonistic. There was a raw honestly about his stance and a lot of his content was hilarious and honestly resonated with me.

    1. Truth Seeker Post author

      I don’t know him.

    2. Miguel Bravo

      Alas Adolf, you re more sensible to pepper spray that i am.

    3. Smokin' cigs

      Yes, he had the amazing line making fun of all the boyos “Free pussy … at all costs”.

      It’s funny yours was the first comment. This article reminded me of LooksMaximus too. Why? The leverage is the money part. Competence is still “rewarded” the problem is that yes, you won’t get the legacy and healthy family part, which is in part what Truth is getting at. But it’s not possible at this juncture anyway, his other point. I found Looks to be highly entertaining because online turned everything into whoredom anyway, just drawn out and socially acceptable.

      Is he still alive? I hope so. What didn’t he regret regarding those videos? Thanks.

    4. twptwp@abv.bg

      He is alive, but he dropped all his social media accounts, because he was disappointed that most of the men he attracted are no different than the idiots who follow all the redpill gurus.

      1. Smokin' Cigs

        Any idea where he is? I’d like to send him my best wishes. I’d also love to see him make some funny vids again, or assess the West or overseas markets.

  2. Pessimist

    Who are the controllers and/or Elites you write about .

    Thanks

    1. Truth Seeker Post author

      I don’t know who is exactly at the top of the top. (It’s probably not even humans.)

      1. pessimist

        Interesting outlook.
        May not be human.

      2. Miguel Bravo

        Come on Victoriaseeker, support a bit more the gaytrans agenda, like when u said women love more than men. Men are stronger and smarter because they have a natural stronger energy field (conciousness), women took leverage because Kyle and Zaratustra betrayed, this world is messed by Pascal and Billie because women are envious by nature, they seek power, men seek beauty and creation, this trend of chopping boys genitalia and stealing energy fields is whats messing the world, give the nature a chance man, ull see things improving quickly. You know who are the rulers, virgin Billie, Emmanuel macron and the seven angels: I. Efeso/ Es feo/Ugly/Shrek ur dearest nohemi II.Esmirna/Es Marin/Andrew Garfield/Keanu. III. Pergamo/Magreo/Jesus Christ the worst of them all, IV. Tiatira/Ratiita/Rat/Steve/Restituo V.Sardis/Sidras/Buonarotti/Miguel Angel Revilla, Ilia Topuria. VI. Filadelfia/La Fidelia/Fidel Castro. VII. Laodicea/El Caido/Shigeru Miyamoto. Im Hades and you Death from Apocalypse of St. John/Azrael/Gotye/Satan. I tried my best to protec boys and kids from dick chopping and violation, but you in love with Jenetia Kroole/Necrophilus Norbert so fuck the world. We re doomed. You know a whore shit about love Persephone./ Es PerĂłn. World is messed and there is no way to fix it.

  3. Treil

    Women get her power with the birth control pills. The absolute power when you own the ability of free (without consequence) sex. As a women to give it for sources, as a men to get it freely (only for 1% of men, in different life stages). 99% of man, and if we consider I fuck I want to, no man has free sex, and almost all women have.
    Before birth control pills the consequence of sex was obvious. Women had really hard decision because of this “consequence”, which man give the opportunity of sex. And for most men the price was high, but affordable (marriage). They kneel with the ring, but not for the marriage, for the sex.
    Only social control, behaviours slowed down the effect of birth control, but the time is up and the social media has a huge and most part in acceleration. Women own the sex market, because they are no more vulnerable with life with an unwanted child. They don’t need man for living, only if she want give a birth. Even then the divorce solve the “man problem” when the spark gone.
    Women finally realised by social changes they own sex and so the power. Most of them not consciously, because no women looking for social researches, red pill, because she can’t laid. She can laid anytime, and secure a relationship with most guy. And if she can’t secure the Chad she always can blame all man, because as an 20’s attractive women her environment grows her ego to a level, she can’t feel herself guilty anymore. Women get trapped between the old social behaviors and her own desires. She romanticised by chivalry, the chasing good man, but fuck with chads while remain dry as a desert by chivalrous good guys.
    Only a fool kneel with the ring for a marriage. Women should kneel for marriage, but they still expect from man, because the expect goods from a freely given sex.
    There are no ultimate solution. As a man the only way to fake the high level man as some birds in wildlife, and wait a women bait the hook. It may takes month, years, or even never happen. Also you can visit high level prostitutes (OF girls or escorts), or free to fap on porn.

    1. Truth Seeker Post author

      Agree. Condoms and pills are a big form of leverage in favor of women (and some men – certainly not average bros).

      Without those promiscuous behavior will be limited greatly. Good luck acquiring a high body count without getting major STDs in the process.

      So, once again social behavior comes down to leverage in the physical world.

  4. Franck Ahipo

    please post more often.i love your writing sytle.been following you since more than 10 years.your books really change my life

  5. yshbhriydzcnzhozay

    Even if collective action proves difficult, individual choices can still weaken social forces mentioned in the post. For example, some people suggest using escorts. But you should realize that the use of escorts contributes to the problems discussed in the blog. Every time you pay for escort you become poorer and escort providers become richer. Buying escort is tantamount to giving up the leverage (money) and voluntarily reinforcing the said social dynamics. Each dollar you spend on escort providers, adult movie actresses, gold diggers, divorce fraudsters, engagement ring makers, and other players in the sexual market make sex more expensive and scare. If women control access to sex, then you control whether you will allow them to use it as a leverage or profit from it.
    It is understandable that most men have high sex drive and may be need some kind of a relief valve. Some will still go out and get an escort, but each person has a choice whether to do it or not. The use of escorts is illegal in many jurisdictions and many users end up in the clutches of the criminal justice system which, in turn, keeps the misandric legal machinery working. Each escort-related arrest leads to fines, court costs, forfeitures, and investigative costs, all of which incentivize expansion of the enforcement and ruin lives of escort users. It is not uncommon that escorts double and get paid as informants for law enforcement. And if so, do you want them to buy escort services from those who are paid to fail you?
    Finally, the assertion that women have a high sex drive too is doubtful if we observe that escort providers are mostly females, while escort buyers are males. It does not happen very often that females buy escort from males. If females had high drive for 10/10 men, then, at least in some cases, there should be evidence of highly paid 10/10 male escorts, but there is very limited evidence of that these exist in any appreciable numbers. Even 10/10 males still have to provide something beyond sex. The asymmetry of cash flow in escort markets offers an unfiltered insight into relative values placed on sex by males and females and leads to an unavoidable conclusion that sex is much more valuable males than females.

    1. Treil

      Sex with women always has the price if you are not in top 1% male, even that case you already paid a price to get into top 1% or your parents made you a playboy with their funds. Marriage is the most expensive, hookers are the cheapest, escorts more expensive than hookers, still they are provide the same service but in much higher quality. I didn’t suggested paying for escort, I mentioned this is a possible way for average male with certain income for access for sex. I have to admit if you are after certain number of unsuccessful dates, wasted lot of your time, money and your sanity, escorts will become more and more tempting. Still I’m not suggesting paying for sex, it’s only an option and the choice is only yours.

      1. Juul

        I would 💯% make use of or rotate between 2-3 good looking escorts every now and then if I had the financial freedom, I honestly can’t stand female behavior at all, it’s not worth the sex.

        1. yshbhriydzcnzhozay

          If you ever find yourself in the enviable position of being able to afford rotations between escorts, always remember Jefferey Epstein and more recently Sean Combs. Apprarently, Mr Combs hired an escort from another state and helped her with transportation which, as it turned out, violated “human trafficking” laws. On top of that, he had to pay undisclosed sums to other escort workers who suddenly discovered a legal opportunity to legally extort additional sums.

      2. Smokin' Cigs

        Treil nailed it again here, the price you pay to be in the conversation – job, height, working out, looks, haircut, clothes, going to the right place,etc – men make all this happen women just show up. And now they don’t really, as they just keep looking at screens and are lazy, which is why you have to get them young.

        The only point of marriage at this juncture would be religious and wouldn’t involve the state, so that limits you yet again, because the women worth marrying would have to be like 21-22 and have a good dad. Who is going to get married in modernity like that? It would only make sense also to a man who has resources and is at least 10-20 years older, so not gonna happen (in the west).

        Juul is right too. The other day, I had a thought about a girl, in high school days who eventually became an actress. A friend of mine even dated her, easy 8, was a year younger than I was. She was the kind of girl that made it tragic that she was so good looking. She screamed either airhead or stupid at you when she talked. It was unbelievable annoying. He must have only dated her for a week. lol – I think she was in a movie with a big actor, but got like a 5 second part. That was all. I imagine she had to sleep with someone just to get that single mini scene in passing in a movie, sad stuff.

        The point is, when you think about how good looking or how sex a time or two a week might be, but then will get old – and all the time you have to deal with a woman’s nonsense and anxiety – it’s an amazingly bad ROI. I think when you pass maybe late 30s this becomes unbelievably obvious and not worth it. It doesn’t help that the only women that are actually good looking are 18-23, truly, maybe 24-25, and 26 is the cutoff.

        1. Jose

          Nice anecdote that shows why (and this applies to both genders) paying attention to looks alone when seeking something beyond sex is an awful idea that often backfires (no wonder why so many celebrity couples divorce after a few years or even months).

          I think lust around that kind of women might be inevitable as a straight man, but if you were raised correctly and have common sense, it is easy to control the urges in safe ways (fapping for example) and avoid getting into a kind of compromise you will regret later.

    2. Jose

      Agree on both points. If I’m not mistaken there are actual scientific studies since decades ago proving that women have a considerably lower “physical” sex drive than men on average, and your example is a perfect way to illustrate it. This doesn’t mean they lack sexual urges and fantasies, but are often satisfied through more subtle ways than porn or direct intercourse (such as erotic novels, which have an insanely big market).

      As someone who went to a strip club a few years ago in the Netherlands out of curiosity and mild depression, I would also advice any men to don’t take the choice of paying for sex lightly and avoid it if they can. Besides being another gear of a morally bankrupt machine like you point out, there are many risks involved that are not worthwhile even in countries where the “industry” is legal and regulated. If you have some conscience and go down the rabbit hole, the experience leaves you a bad taste in your mouth that will probably haunt you forever.

  6. Jose

    Good to see you back. I was starting to believe that this hiatus was probably permanent.

    This is a nice in-depth exploration of most of the uncomfortable and brutal truths about modern gender dynamics already mentioned one way or another in the previous posts of this year.

    I’m also bored of nonsense such as “male privilege” and “patriarchy”. They are true (and with some important caveats) only in some specific regions of the world, but in the West like most hard-core feminists and progressives claim 24/7? Please… The mythical privilege they are delusional about only applies to probably 1% of men in Western societies, and still the power and social leverage these men have pale in comparison to a woman in a similar percentile (or even lower).

    Still, I don’t hate all women nor believe that all of them are inherently evil, but unfortunately we live in a system that encourages and rewards them for treating men like disposable tools or toys. The natural outcome is that dateable women with genuine values and strong moral principles are incredibly rare, so you’re most likely better off alone than in bad company (especially marriage) even if you are a legendary Chad.

    1. yshbhriydzcnzhozay

      I agree that females do have sexual urges and fantasies, but the question as to how they satisfy them is not fully clear. Observe that for a female finding a partner for sex is trivial. Women do not really need to be subtle to satisfy their urges. Not only they can get sex easily, but they can also get benefits, such cash(sometimes), free travel, dining, or personal services from a partner (e.g. opening doors etc.). In this context, erotic novels may reflect preferences for amenities and benefits that should accompany sex, which again shows that sex per se is not that valuable. Real-world observations reveal that female faces brighten with joy and happiness when they see a newborn or a very young child. Perhaps, seeing and caring for children gives women endorphin rush. A related observation is womens’ willingness to pay for expensive reproductive services, such as IVF that can cost tens of thousands of dollars. Men are rarely willing to buy these services and if they do then it is often in response to a demands from their female partner. If some men pay significant sums for escorts then some women pay comparable amounts for IVF and other reproductive services. It seems that in addition to an intercourse, bearing and rearing children is probably what truly resolves female sexual urges and fantasies.

      1. Jose

        You are maybe onto something with that theory of the maternal instinct behind the female sexual urges, but I’ve known a lot of women (most of them in their 20s or early 30s though) who claim to dislike kids and not being interested at all in bearing children. My guess is that most of the time that rejection is mostly conditioned by media and societal/ideological indoctrination (nowadays it is highly frowned upon in urbanite circles when a woman seeks to form a family before chasing a professional career) and, therefore, the urge is repressed and distorted. These same women often look eagerly for cheaper and less demanding replacements for a child, like pets (especially cats).

        When they realize they want to become mothers, it is often too late or risky for them biologically, so that’s exactly why they don’t have other choice other than resorting to reproductive services to fulfill that wish. It is a strong urge indeed because, as you mention, they are extremely expensive (some even more than most VIP sexual services) and also quite dehumanizing. They are basically a socially accepted form of eugenics based mostly on superficial physical traits: customers are often given a catalog of donors with their pictures, which often have to meet some ridiculous looks requirements comparable to those of a dating app.

        1. Smokin' Cigs

          Yes Jose, the battle became women only becoming serious when it’s too late (30s), and by not giving men any reason to be “married” or stick with one woman forever (youth/fertility), they ruined the entire intersexual dynamice and family formation.

          All in all, it shows you that they can’t really think on their own, since it’s easy to see what happens to all these women, yet the 20-25 year olds still won’t trade their earlier years (and it’s only a few years, a great trade for them) for lifetime sponsorship. Silly – instead they wait til 30+ and hope some guy will beta bux them. That can happen, but then that guy just becomes an option that isn’t all that special to her.

          1. Truth Seeker Post author

            Very good point.

            I’ve talked to a great number of women who are 27-30. All of those that I met in person, did nothing before reaching 30 (after that I stopped checking, but they are probably still waiting).

            A very stupid move.

            A woman loses at least 30% of her purchasing power at midnight on her 30th birthday. It’s funny-sad.

            But they don’t get it. They think “it’s’just a number”. So instead of cashing out at 27 (arguably the ideal year as it allows for both – a youth spent Sex and the city Lifestyle but still some years left), they keep waiting and waiting for the roof to open up and give them….a miracle.

  7. Eduardo Alvarez

    Es por eso que las Escorts se han convertido en un negocio por demĂĄs rentable y cada vez mĂĄs comĂșn. Pero es un parche defectuoso sobre un sistema mĂĄs defectuoso aĂșn. De todas maneras, el artĂ­culo me pareciĂł excelente

  8. Ani

    Brutal article as usual man. May I ask you a question? Is it possible to build muscle mass, and to lose fat (I’m skinnyfat), by eating one meal a day and doing strenght training every day? Also, what do you think of A.I advancements and their impact in the industries in general? How can we survive the digital revolution?

  9. Edward

    Men have always done the heavy work, always! But if back then we got a prize for it….now all you get is depression, sadness and loneliness! Most of your arguments are wrong about the past…..there can be no society where men do not protect women or carry the heavy work, otherwise the human race would die! Women cannot do such heavy work, hence why they had limited privileges……..privileges that are today given to them without any doubt whatsoever!

    1. Jose

      I think Truth’s point is exactly what you say: he’s not implying men acting as protectors and doing heavy work was ever bad. It is a role we should fulfill to maintain a working society, and expecting women to do it is insane and delusional. Until a few decades ago the sacrifice men did was at least compensated and there was a reasonable balance in those gender dynamics.

      That’s clearly not the case anymore. We pay the consequences with a mental health issues epidemic in both genders of the Western world.

  10. Motasem

    While many of your observations about Western laws and culture are valid, the conclusions drawn , that men have become weak or servants, and that women hold all leverage, stem from a worldview based on western culture and laws there and this is not the case in eastern countries especially in Islamic countries in the middle east.

    Let me start with facts from Quran:
    Allah says:
    “And do not wish for that by which Allah has made some of you exceed others. For men is a share of what they have earned, and for women is a share of what they have earned.”
    (Surah An-Nisā’, 4:32)

    And again:
    “Men are the protectors and maintainers (qawwāmĆ«n) of women because Allah has given one more strength than the other, and because they support them from their means.”
    (Surah An-Nisā’, 4:34)

    This verse does not mean superiority. It means responsibility , financial, physical, and protective. Men are not to dominate, nor women to exploit. Each has rights with equity and mutual accountability.

    Your post correctly identifies injustices in many modern legal systems , especially regarding divorce, child custody, and false equality laws that disadvantage men.
    But Islam offers a radically just alternative that neither side today seems to want.

    In Islamic Law:
    -The woman’s wealth remains hers alone , men cannot touch it without consent.
    -The man is obligated to provide maintenance (nafaqah), housing, and protection (During marriage period).
    -Custody is decided by the best interest of the child, not blind gender preference.
    -Inheritance laws ensure balanced social welfare, not arbitrary 50/50 divisions.

    In Muslim-majority societies that still uphold aspects of Shari‘ah (e.g., Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Morocco, and parts of Malaysia), divorce does not automatically enrich one party over the other.

    The Qur’an says:
    “And for divorced women is a provision according to what is acceptable, a duty upon the righteous.”
    (Surah Al-Baqarah, 2:241)

    Islam protects both genders by anchoring rights in divine law, not human trends.

    The sense of male hopelessness, social invisibility, and emotional exhaustion described in your post is a byproduct of secular modernity, not divine design.

    When faith leaves the heart, power replaces purpose.
    When modesty leaves society, competition replaces compassion.

    The Prophet ï·ș foretold:
    “From among the signs of the Hour is that a man will obey his wife and disobey his mother, bring his friends near and keep his father away
”
    (Narrated by Ibn Mājah, 3987)

    This is not a call to oppress women but a warning that when the natural hierarchy of mercy is inverted, society decays.

    Much of the issues about dating, manipulation, and emotional imbalance arises because Western societies have abandoned modesty and marriage ethics.

    In Islam:
    There is no dating market, no emotional exploitation.
    Zina (fornication) is prohibited not to restrict love, but to preserve dignity.
    A man does not beg for a woman’s approval; he respectfully proposes through her family.
    A woman does not leverage her beauty; she is honored for her faith and character.

    The Prophet ï·ș said:
    “A woman is married for four things: her wealth, her lineage, her beauty, and her religion. Choose the religious one, and you will be blessed.”
    (Sahih al-Bukhari, 5090)

    Where Islam prevails, these games of dominance vanish. The relationship becomes a contract of mutual mercy and responsibility, not leverage and manipulation.

    Allah defines true strength not by muscles, money, or leverage , but by faith and justice.

    “Indeed, the most noble of you in the sight of Allah is the most righteous of you.”
    (Surah Al-កujurāt, 49:13)

    And the Prophet ï·ș said:
    “The best of you are those who are best to their wives.”
    (Tirmidhi, 1162)

    Strength in Islam is the ability to be gentle when angry, just when wronged, and faithful when tested.

    In our countries (for example, Syria being where I come from) where Islamic family laws are partially preserved:

    -Men still propose with honor, not humiliation.
    -Women still value piety and character over social status.
    -Divorce rates remain lower than in secular states.
    -Emotional stability, extended family ties, and shared roles reduce alienation.

    Even with imperfections, these societies retain more rahmah (mercy) between the sexes , because Allah’s law, not human ideology, defines their roles.

    Men are not weak.
    Women are not superior.
    Both are test subjects in a world that abandoned divine guidance.

    The Qur’an says:
    “Whoever does righteousness, whether male or female, while he is a believer , We will surely cause him to live a good life, and We will reward them according to the best of what they used to do.”
    (Surah An-Naងl, 16:97)

    Islam doesn’t call men to resentment , it calls them to lead with mercy and faith.
    Nor does it call women to exploitation , it calls them to honor through modesty and loyalty.

    In a world collapsing under the illusion of “equality,” Islam remains the only system that delivers justice without rivalry, honor without humiliation, and love without leverage.

    Look for a muslim girl to marry bro 🙂 (real muslim girl can be spotted from her costumes, commitmment to her family and overall ethics system that goes agaisnt what you described about women’s deeds these days).

    Feel free to email me if you got any questions

  11. Leonardo

    If a man attacks a woman in public, the group of males around her will more than likely protect her due to societal conditioning and pressure not to be labeled as “cowards”.

    There is nothing dumber that intervening in a situation such as this. First, you have no information as to why this is happening. It could be a case of infidelity, a husband angry because he was served a restraining order and booted from his own house, a pimp beating his bitch, etc. Second, It is none of your business and if you intervene, you will most likely face negative consequences. You can be hurt or even arrested. Let the government deal with it.

    I would continue to walk on by without even acknowledging the situation. I am not in favor of men hitting women (in my family it never happened) but It seems other men are and women’s behavior is very effective in provoking them. Not my problem.

  12. SamS

    I love Truth’s content too and I’m a long time follower too. Follower of NoN and the former blogs too. But I do like the infrequent posts. It’s like there’s much more to anticipate when you don’t know when the next episode comes. Unlike everything else in the modern world. I just hope that Truth takes all the time he needs to only write when he wants to and feels like he has something to say.

  13. Smokin' Cigs

    Selection pressure on women and leverage is only possible, really, when resources aren’t abundant and the M:F ratio isn’t high.

    On these two hang all the red pill laws and prophets

    1. yshbhriydzcnzhozay

      Let me add my observations about the selection pressure. After World War II, the gender ratio in several countries became highly skewed due to heavy battlefield casualties. My grandmother married my grandfather, who survived the war. As a child, I could sense that she deeply resented him. When I grew up, I asked her why she had married him if she didn’t like him in the first place. She told me that, due to the shortage of men after the war, she had no choice but to settle for him. Neither my grandmother nor grandfather were happy with their marriage. Even when there is a selection pressure, it does not necessarily make people happy. People want what they want and M:F ratio can hardly change the happiness equation.

      1. Smokin' Cigs

        ysh, you’re still here though; acting like the marriage stuff was ever ideal, or that it would have been better somehow that your parents or you weren’t born, is crazy and a small price to pay. Nowadays we have a huge portion of really well off men that are crowded out by technology, fake money, the government, simps, etc.

        There are barely any women to marry, certainly few that are worth it. The more you see what women complain about, by the way, the more you realize why most people never listened to them throughout time. The complaining and emotions never end. But having kids with a man around is better than not.

        People have all this “stuff” provided for them in the modern age, and women are unhappier than ever, and have no kids (most of them at thist point). I remain unconvinced.

  14. twptwp

    Nature pilled.

    You are born with a desired genes or not, it’s a simple and predictable sexual selection game. You are an average looking man, but you can make a lot of money so you can pass as good deal in third world country, even that is dependable on your genetic structure, because making good money depends on intelligence and drive, which are based on your genes and upbringing.

    It’s weird have we have a free will, but at the same time everything in our life is predictable to a huge degree. If you father did poorly with women his whole life, but somehow got into a sexless marriage with your mother due to social pressure, it’s most likely you will end up the same way or just a loner if don’t want to participate to the social norms. Considering all the the statistics if you were born poor you will end poor too or even worse, if you were born in wealthy successful family it’s highly likely that will be wealthy too or accumulate even more generational wealth. There is a saying “the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree”.

    1. Smokin' Cigs

      twp,

      The problem that I find is that you can be born into a good family, but most humans are not well raised now, so if you’re religious and traditional, and many others aren’t, you don’t have many choices. Combine that with women – if they aren’t young or there are way too many other guys around crowding it all out, and the women are going to college, careers, etc, why get married? I made it to top 5% of nearly all categories but paying all that time and attention for not getting a young wife, or one near a 6.5 or even 7 is just not worth it.

      Like I told Truth, once the society got women out of their 21-25 year ages chasing university and careers with debt, it was over. There is no man that’s going to sacrifice his wealth and career unless he gets a young, pure woman he can grow with and remember when she was young. They want you to marry washed up women and be happy about it, when you have a house, millions, whatever. Not happening. Women in their 30s just aren’t physically attractive anymore, period. I’m in way better shape and there’s a thing called “woman years” (like dog years). A woman at 30 is like a 55 year old man, in my view. Worse if he has money and is still in shape.

  15. John

    40 percent of women don’t have $100 bucks in checking or savings. Debt? Got more debt than CHAD’s.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *