Who do you think is your biggest rival in the world of romance?
Who’s gonna take your current or future girl?
-The 6’5″, blue eyes, trust fund, muscular, 190 IQ guy in finance? No.
The millionaire son who spends more on breakfast than you do on a car? No.
The “gifted” pro athlete? No.
The popular actor whose face is all over the billboards? No.
The mafioso bad boy gangster who has the customs in his pocket and transits drugs as if it’s mineral water? No.
What if I tell you that your biggest competition in the world of dating is not even a person?
What If tell you that he isn’t even part of the visible matter?
=======
He’s a ghost…invisible like radio waves.
Do you know who he is?
Well, it’s not a “he”. It’s an “it”.
Your biggest competition is…
Wait for it…
<< FEMALE IMAGINATION >>
It’s precisely female imagination that “cucks” most men rather than some mythical, shape-shifting persona known as Chad who displays an otherworldly face and physique.
Don’t scream. I know that Chads exist in physical form. They are here. On Earth. And at some locations, there’s a fairly large concentration of them.
But the reality of the matter is this:
Chads Are Not The Competition You Should Worry About
Some men wrongfully get angry at the so-called Chads. But Chads are not the catalysts of modern dating insanity.
Chads are just a tiny percentage of men who happen to be handsome. They don’t dictate the morals today nor did they create the digital infrastructure that resulted in the “free dating market”.
Can you imagine Chad rebuilding his Linux kernel on New Year’s Eve and developing apps 24/7 while posting about his bulk progress on the Starting Strength forums? Come on.
The very men who are receiving the negative effect of “digital love” are building and maintaining the poison that isolates them from the dating process.
Or in simpler terms, the nerdy coder working on the backend of a dating app is the same man who gets no matches and effective dates from the same app.
This is also the man who would pay premium fees to get some basic features that allegedly boost his success.
But this incredibly frustrating situation is not caused by Chad.
Chad is neither incentivized nor smart enough to engineer anything like that. He is just a beneficiary.
Chads = 1%
Legit Chads form something like 1% of the population. I am deadly serious. The requirements to be part of the group are just so high that most men can’t qualify on all fronts.
Most people don’t realize how rare it is to have true Chad genetics. Where I live, I seldom see legit Chads. Scratch that. The last time I saw a true Chad was years ago, and I still remember it. It’s just that rare.
Many men have 1 or maybe 2 “Chad features” but miss the others. For example, right next to my door, there’s a dude who has a 9/10 face but is very short.
Ultimately, Chads don’t have the numbers to take your women. And I am not talking about marriage only. Sexually too. The number of Chads is so damn low that even if those mythical men wanted to sleep with all the women on the planet, they won’t have the energy and desire to do so.
Example of a Legit Chad:
Dolph Lundgren is the ultimate Chad.
He has it all:
- 1.96m tall
- attractive manly face – square, jaw, blond hair well into his 50s and 60s, blue eyes…etc.
- Muscular body way above the average
- Worldwide fame as a movie star…etc.
- Higher education (a degree in chemical engineering from the Royal Institute of Technology and a master’s degree in chemical engineering from the University of Sydney in 1982)
Good luck topping that.
Guys like Dolph Lundgren are 1% of the 1%.
Of course, this is an extreme example. You only need the face and the height of Lundgren to be part of the Chad Kingdom. The rest is not necessary.
So, what’s happening?
The main problem is neither the existence of ultra-attractive men nor the female desire to be with one of those.
The main issue is the female delusion/imagination that women hold onto for years without realizing that what they want and think they “deserve” (mostly for existing) is just not in the cards.
Women are so far OFF in their estimates, it’s laughable.
In 99% of the cases, when an average woman rejects an average man, it’s NOT because she’d found a “Chad”. Not at all.
She hasn’t found anything.
I am next life dead serious.
I didn’t know that back in the day and would often conclude that if a woman rejects me, it’s because she has a better option waiting for her.
But I never saw it. Most of the women who classified me as “close, but no cigar”, never improved. They never found Chad and remained single for years.
I am not kidding to make myself feel better. There’s no point. My weaknesses are apparent to anyone who’s followed the site for more than a month.
So, why did they reject me if they had no one?
Because they have their imagination telling them lies upon lies.
I’ve seen it happen from the first row with my sister and a female colleague that I’ve known for 15 years or so.
Honestly, I’d be somewhat happier, if all those women were finding Chads. At least, the nation would be getting more attractive, filtering out the average losers like me.
What’s even more ironic is that when you look at the father of the same women who are playing too hard to get, you realize that those men were average at best.
If the mothers were as pretentious as the daughters, there would be no daughters today.
Chads Don’t Always Win
Many Chads experience the “rich people cry too” phenomenon.
Chads have access to many women. The women who don’t respond to your text and throw obstacles in your path to their heart or **** are the same women who would behave on the other end of the spectrum if Mr. Chad were to appear.
But that doesn’t mean that Chad can’t be vulnerable. Ironically, sometimes even Chad can’t win against a woman’s imagination. Some Chads are weak emotionally as they’ve never faced the rejection that average men fight daily.
So, they become softer and when a problem arises they may show a little more destabilization than necessary.
Women don’t like that as they see Chad as someone who’s impenetrable. And when their idol reveals that he is human they may decide that they can do better and bounce to find a Chad who doesn’t cry.
Yes. The pickiness today is that level of insane.
Women Often Choose Nothing Over Something Because of a Fake Dream
One of the weirdest realizations that a sane male brain would have to make is that a surprising number of women would rather choose nothing over something.
And what’s even more counter-intuitive is that older women (30+) do the same to an even higher degree.
I first learned that from a pick-up artist who eventually went crazy (many of them do), but his fate is a different story.
He frequently shared his frustration that even women who should be in a hurry to find a man due to their biological clock ticking were often rejecting him despite having zero options or were taking things slowly to the point where the interaction would die. The guy was average-looking and exceptionally intelligent (160 or even higher IQ).
At the time, I didn’t make much of this, but eventually, I saw it on my own multiple times.
There is an army of women who will soon lose their ability to reproduce without technological interventions but still can’t make up their minds due to a self-destructive hallucination living in their heads.
And sadly, things don’t go well for most of them.
At the end of 2019, I talked to a 36y.o. woman (not romantically), and she told me that she doesn’t have a man next to her because she doesn’t want to “compromise”.
Guess, what?
It’s 2024 and she is posting “what doesn’t break you makes you stronger” type of wisdom on her lonely Facebook profile flooded with AI images of her theoretical 20y.o. self.
Chad HAS ZERO practical fault for this nonsense happening.
Women should be intelligent enough to realize the mathematical impossibility for 1% of men to be with 99% of them long-term.
But…
The Female Delusion Is STRONKKKK
Many of you have probably seen the clip of the girl saying that she is looking for a 6’5″ man in finance who also has blue eyes and a trust fund. It’s super popular.
Guess, what?
Someone had calculated that only 2 men in the world cover those requirements (Obviously, those stats are up for debate, but the number is astronomically low for sure.)
Another woman had written “That’s one more man than she needs” in the comment section.
And I can guarantee you that many others support that delusion.
Back in the day, when Meghan Markle married Prince Harry, I remember reading an FB post from a woman who was using Markle as an example of why you “should wait for love” instead of settling fast because you never know what would happen.
Yes. The delusion is that stronkkk.
Many think that a literal prince is waiting for them.
Except that isn’t the case.
You have a much higher probability of dying during your work commute (regardless of the method – bus, car, bicycle, walking, e-scooter, jetpack…etc.) than experiencing the same romance.
Understanding True In/Compatibility
All of this could be fixed if people were familiar with the concept of true compatibility.
Many naive souls search for compatibility and incompatibility in the details.
E.g., I am a dog person. He is a catperson. We aren’t compatible.
That’s retarded.
There are three main factors (the complete list is longer) determining compatibility:
- Social status (+money)
- Age
- Physical stats
When the gap between two people is massive in one or more of the parameters above, we have incompatibility.
For example, if you live in your car, and your future wife owns a Mall, you are massively incompatible.
If you are 55 and she is 19 years old, you are incompatible. (Don’t fall for the DiCaprio delusion – that’s for another post).
If you are an 8/10 and she is a 2/10, you are massively incompatible.
I am not saying relationships are impossible in the above scenarios, but they will be unlikely to last.
In general, you need to meet somewhere in the middle. Compromises are welcome within reason. All of this ensures that neither party has too much influence over the other.
With this approach, the number of options available to the average woman skyrockets, and her chances of remaining alone in the company of a Chad who exists only in her dreams diminish greatly.
Predictions
I don’t have any superpowers and can’t see the future with great clarity. All I can do is activate my intuition and couple it with my logical side to come up with a prediction that makes sense, at least to me.
Many of you have probably heard of Newton’s universal law of motion which goes like this:
An object at rest stays at rest and an object in motion stays in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force.
This principle applies here perfectly.
The social mechanism that we are following right now has been going strongly for many years (the body stays in motion) due to the absence of an outside/unbalanced force to act upon it and change the trajectory.
Or in simple terms, no one cares about fixing the nightmare called dating today. And all of us actively contribute to it (or have done so in the past).
The problem is extremely large…larger than people think and will require an insane restructuring of society. And no one wants to deal with the ramifications of a similar shift.
So, people just let the free market sort itself. Maybe that’s the best way…I don’t know.
But ultimately, the world is going to experience the following to extreme proportions:
- An epidemic of single people (men and women) who don’t have any sort of higher purpose to live for and who engage in pointless, fruitless activities (e.g., watching TV series) during their free time.
- An epidemic of single mothers raising troubled children who have a chaotic or even absent moral code.
- An epidemic of ostracized fathers who spend 99% of their time working to pay alimony for kids they can’t even see.
- An increase or maybe even removal of the retirement age due to the lack of workforce. In other words, people will be working from birth to death simply because there is no one to earn their pensions.
- A massive boost of clinical depression due to solitude, permanent romantic frustration, lack of hope, and consumption of processed/consolation food.
- Drug abuse
- Higher crime rates (why be civil when you have nothing to live for?)
…etc.
In other words, this is a massively negative trajectory for everyone. The only difference is that some people will experience it sooner than others.
The virus is only getting stronger.
Of course, humanity will not disappear. We’ve seen and been through worse. I guess our sinful nature cyclicly leads to similar cataclysms throughout history.
– Natty
Part 2
You thought I was done?
Not yet. There’s one more enemy to expose.
Beside her imagination, you have one more rival:
<<The Single Life >>
What does this mean?
At one point, women get addicted to the perks that come with the “single life”. The vast majority of single women (and many men) share the following characteristics:
1. Average or even above average income that makes for a comfortable living on your own.
2. Living like a 20 or 30-something “teenager” – nights out with the girls, traveling, “Netflix”, eating out at restaurants…things that you wouldn’t be able to do as often and as easily if you had 2 small kids to raise.
3. Occasionally going to “Tinder dates” where you meet “disappointing” men who just don’t have what you are looking for.
4. A dog, a cat, a rabbit…some sort of pet to feed your maternal need to take care of something.
5. Hitting the gym frequently to showcase the new yoga pants.
…etc.
Eventually, women get addicted to that life. (Ditto for single men, although the activities are slightly different). And when they meet a new guy, he has to fight not only their imagination but their love for their current existence.
The longer a person stays single, the harder it is to leave the single life behind. And nothing is surprising about that. You just get used to it.
And believe me when I say that it takes a lot of force to push a single woman residing with a pet outside of her single life trajectory. And when you add in the Chad delusion, you face two knights that are hard to overpower.
Somewhat ironically, the more we need to change, the more reluctant we are to do it.
– Natty
Summed up in a joke.
A woman is looking for a partner and contacts a supernatural dating agency who take her to a tall building. She’s told that the general desirability of the men increases on each level and she should move from level to level until she meets the man of her dreams who they guarantee will fall in love with her. She is told that she cannot go back and that, should she fail to choose, she will remain single forever.
She starts at the first level and though the men are nice, there’s no-one she she thinks is partner material. She goes to the next level. The men are definitely better, more attractive, slightly wealthier, but none seem to want children.
She moves to the next level and is, again, disappointed. She continues from level to level and, though they improve, the men are never quite what she wants and the thought that there are better men to be found on later levels drives her on.
Until finally she leaves a level and finds only the exit from the building and a notice that says “Sadly, there are no men that are good enough for you, we cannot help you, and hope you enjoy your life alone”
Thanks for this comment! I really liked this story / joke, and I don’t usually like stories etc. Or maybe I like them, but they just don’t stick with me that well. This was a good one and can be used in different contents too.
What’s the point of finding a partner if you’re a guy and you have options.
Breeders are the bane of all that is good and holy. Forcing life into this world without their consent is pure evil. Be pure and control your animalistic urges, aspire to being more than an unthinking primate.
Very true but in this modern dating era , if you are not blessed with good looks or money , you’re more likely to struggle as a man when it comes to dating women
I completely disagree with your article for the first time. If that’s the case then why am I seeing a lot of losers reproducing? A lot of men who are financially broke and have below-average looks are reproducing. Women are passive by nature they tend to go to the men who simp and white knight the most too regardless of the circumstances unless these circumstances are really major which most people aren’t. The real enemy is men. The majority of men are simps amplifying women’s behavior to an extreme. Then again most men are too broke mentally and financially to have morals anyway.
While not fully agree with your point, there is some truth behind it: a lot of men who are complete pieces of shit (morally and as “providers”) around the world somehow father more children and have more active sex lives than decent and principled men.
I think TruthSeeker talks explains why this happens in his articles about “bad boys”. This is one of the reasons why often the shaming of male virginity (or prolonged periods without sex or romantic life) in the West doesn’t make any sense and is pure evil to me. Clearly an active sex live doesn’t make a man better, sometimes in fact it makes him more comtemptible (womanizers who refuse to recognize and take care of their own children they fathered irresponsibly, men who often cheat and abuse their partners for no good reason, etc).
Ironically, nowadays virgins are more demonized in some countries than those men despite the thing a tiny minority of virgins do at worst is vent misogynistic and unpleasant thoughts on sites like reddit and 4chan.
It’s going to collapse that’s my prediction! You cannot sustain a society without births or relationships or marriage! It’s impossible even with the current technology! It’s basic laws of nature and unless some huge insane invention comes on our way nothing will break those laws!
Excellent article.
Recently a family member passed away.
She was 90 years old. Single all her life. Never had kids.
She always cried in Christmas, and the only people in her life were the half dozen people that expected to inherit some of her wealth.
The world wants to extract the most out of you, whether you are a man or a woman.
Women should start to opening their eyes before it’s too late.
I dropped social media altogether, only keep ws to communicate with my brother, a few friends and to receive the bill notifications. Social media is one of the main culprits. With a couple of filters and some clever pose any average/below average girl/woman can obtain 50+ likes, let alone the ones who are above average. If this emboldens the sub average ones, just imagine what can be expected from the ones you would desire to date with, women are so delusional nowadays through the social media that 50+ likes suggests them that they are amongst the 10/10.
If we all men dropped social media then no one would be chasing women or liking their posts, they would be the ones chasing us in places like Reddit. Obviously this is just wishful thinking and certainly the gap you leave in the social media will be filled by another 10 men, but you get the point, i quit social media, i did my part to leave a little void in the single men’s pool.
This is completely off topic, but I laughed with the “You have a much higher probability of dying during your work commute (regardless of the method – bus, car, bicycle, walking, e-scooter, jetpack…etc.) than experiencing the same romance.”. Not because of the sad fact, but because of the list of the vehicles or whatever they are. I’m so lost with all the means of transportation today that when I’m walking in the city it feels like I’m in a sci-fi movie. I’ve no glue what the machines are that people are using to move, and someone would have to pay me to use those things. It seems that day by day I get happier with just walking around.
When I was a teenager, I used to have very delusional expectations about women and relationships. I’m not sure if it was age related or something else, but I thought that stuff should be like in the movies. This reduced my opportunities to meet and be with women because I was looking for something that isn’t there at all. I don’t really practice and think wishful thinking that much anymore, but that that was a big mistake. I wish I had known to lower my expectations; I would’ve gained so much more. And this was before the dating apps and all that.
You nailed it at the last section.
Most women that are picky like this are often self sustained, with good income and often enough with an entourage of similar women.
They go out in clubs, have coffee daily at starbucks and go on shopping sprees like there is no tomorrow.
Oh and let’s not forget about travelling.
I’ve even seen women that settle for some poor dude that live in her movie, it’s still about her. If he doesn’t pay his dues, he gets dumped.
And guess what? She goes into another trip, shops for some new dresses and shoes, fucks a couple of other bros who kept hitting on her for years while in the friendzone. Nah kidding, those still are in the friendzone, it’s the hot guy in the club that gets to smash her pussy then by a dick the next day and ghost her.
The sad part is that recently a friend of mine told me about this exact type of woman that he kept orbiting hoping for taste of her clit but she killed herself because life was too hard.
Dude, you totally nailed it. Why would a guy with a lot of money and in shape even bother with someone that’s not going to add to his life (and is young)? It simply makes no sense. And the older and more money a woman has, even if it’s sustenance, means she really won’t want to take care of you, thus, she’s a liability. Sadly.
There is an army of women who will soon lose their ability to reproduce without technological interventions but still can’t make up their minds due to a self-destructive hallucination living in their heads.
The wonders of modern technology (the same that gave us social media and smart phones) now give woman the option to be single mothers by design. They go to a sperm bank, choose from a catalog of donors for specific genetic traits, and get IVF treatment. No need for an actual physical father. No need to settle for anyone. And they do this at any age. Some do so in their 50s. The poor children. Imagine being a 10 year old with a 60 year old mother and no father.
This has become a popular in Spain. Many in their 40s are doing so. And they even qualify for assistance from the state. Under certain conditions the treatment is covered by the national health insurance.
Of course men make this possible by donating their sperm to sperm banks.
I’m too old and lazy to find the sources but I remember seeing research results about how the testosterone levels of men at least in Western world have sunken drastically in about 100 years. There is of course a lot of evidence about how microplastic is everywhere now. Recently there was also a study done in Japan
(https://www.euronews.com/green/2024/05/21/microplastics-found-in-human-testicles-could-be-causing-sperm-counts-to-fall) & (https://academic.oup.com/toxsci/advance-article/doi/10.1093/toxsci/kfae060/7673133) about how microplastic seems to penetrate the reproductive system making the sperm count decrease. Maybe in the future “firing blanks” will be changed into “firing plastics”.
I also saw this article made by a journalist who followed one of the companies that are creating these AI girlfriend apps. The article said that there are many men who rather spend their romantic life with these things. Many of them even send dick pics to those “girls” willingly. Crazily enough, the journalist tried to follow the trails of the company and always stumped on dead ends. Finally, the trails lead to Russia. Journalist was in the end able to find out where (in the US) the CEO of the company lives, but if I remember correctly, the woman was pretty much impossible to meet.
I’m not an expert and I can’t give an educated guess about how things are going to go. But looking at where things are going, those sperm banks are indeed going to be useful in the future. At least if humans want to reproduce. Sperm quality is going down, people would rather have their romantic life with AI. As said, I’m old, lazy and sad, and maybe for that reason I often feel hope in the idea that someone’s going to unplug me into the real life.
I agree about Dolph Lundgren he has lucked out with a lot of things in life however he is NOT 196cm tall. He claims to be but is definitely not! He is in the 6-2.5-6-3 range. In Universal Soldier Ralph Moeller is standing near him who is all of 6-5 and is visibly taller by at least 2″. Regarding his physique he only really looked very impressive in Masters Of The Universe and Showdown In Little Tokyo both of which he was using a lot of steroids. I wouldnt swap his natural physique for my own and certainly not strength wise as ive lifted more than he has. I say this as a huge Dolph fan. Been great seeing him back in bigger movies in recent years.
Inaccurate and misleading height claims seem to be widespread in mainstream acting and sport celebrities.
Sometimes you can find contradicting measures in two or more sources. My guess is that many can get away with those inflated values because they use subtle “tricks” (shoe insoles, sleek boots, etc) to significantly boost their height in most of their public appearances.
Lou Ferrigno and Steven Seagal are two others. Ferrigno has never been anymore than 6-3.5 yet claims 6-5! Seagal is 6-4 but in interviews now claims 6-5. Ferrigno apparently refuses or reluctantly poses with fans taller than he is as he doesnt like it. Its extremely disheartening seeing guys who are rich and successful and still excessively taller than todays average height (6-0) and considerably taller than their own generations average height (5-10) having to lie about something like this.
That says a lot of the kind of men they are, and also of the environment that fueled those insecurities to such extent.
Nowadays, it looks like height in most of the West (and certain Asian countries) is for men what age and weight are for women. Extreme edge cases aside (over 6,5 or below 5,6 ft IMO), it is something that shouldn’t be so much of a big ideal, but idiotic trends make sure to overhype it.
Great article and rebuttal of one of the biggest (and most detrimental) myths spread by blackpill and authentic incel groups on the Internet.
The real enemy are not the “Chads”, but the distorted and delusional social mechanics of the current global civilization. They probably were always there, but social media and other similar inventions are fueling them to dangerous and maybe unsustainable levels. Declining birth rates are becoming a serious issue in many 1st World countries for a reason.
I have known it all the way that you will hit deeply.
Simps were born from Women’s imagination.
The only solution is that they must change.
Unfortunately, they won’t.
Well, honestly there is a good chunk of guys who are 7/10, 8/10, 9/10, who date the average girl (actually below average, objectively 4.5/10, and that’s being too fair), but what affects them is not the single life, but the sexual drought, some of these guys who are not so average are not awful but they are decent, the only thing is their pusillanimous mentality of taking whatever they can just to not be alone, live in a monotonous way (without purpose, or even npc), or not be embarrassed by the filthy, unthinking mass of humans who are strongly brainwashed about reality, many of them are successful, have good careers, jobs, even a good salary, but the lack of determination, the lack of original masculine values, shitty entertainment, the feminine comforts of modernity, have weakened that kind of men.
I say this because I have seen it too many times, so much potential wasted for the mere sake of testing the female sweet palate (influenced by TV, porn fantasies, social media, and bad friendships).
So true. I’ve seen a lot of guys with clearly above average physique (more than 6 ft tall, athletic body, attractive face, etc), skills and status settling down with women who are maybe a 6/10 at best in terms of looks.
Maybe those women are exceptional in other qualities (intelligence, personality, social status, etc) to make up for that, but I’m pretty sure 70% or more of the time it is what you just explained: lack of courage and self-steem that make those men pick the first option available to them even if they could find something better if they were more patient and put an effort… As long as they don’t get too delusional and ridiculous with their expectations like most women, of course.
It reminds me a lot to the misguided mentality many people assume during their first job search after college: believing that a shitty and underpaid job is better than nothing. Sadly, the truth is that a bad first job in your area of expertise can make it way harder for you to get something decent later.
IMO it’s better to be single as long as you need than engaged with a bad match (especially in these times). You should seek a purpose higher than yourself and a family is a noble one, but pretending to build it with a woman you don’t really love out of fear of being alone and shamed by society is not the way to go.
I’m one of these. I have a higher standard, so guess what – I’m single. Now I’m older and have even more money, which is sort of funny. But I’m still not that old. All that means is that I have to go where women actually need me.
If not for working out and T or some competitiveness or wholesomeness in life with a “legacy” women are not really interesting at all. Maybe a woman, but still few, from like 60 or 70 years ago, sure. But not now.
Is dating dead and what are the red flags in a potential candidate? What should a man be like for a girl in her 30s to choose him rather than artificial insemination.
Watch for the low key drug dealer, handing your lady free dope until they are hooked. Specially in the work place, let a nice babe show up, find out real fast who your enemy is. FYI lots of women move dope!
Great insights.
One of your bests posts and a sane oasis for rational thought in a sea of social media stupidity and propaganda.
To strengthen your female imagination argument, her inner circle of women are key narrators reinforcing the Chad fantasy.
I’ve always found it ironic the tech bros building all the social media apps. While simps are funding e-thots. Both combine to fuel the hypergamy of women to chase their Chad delusions.
I’m glad you discussed this weird quirk of the current sexual marketplace.
But ‘free market’ it isn’t because the female single life you mentioned is socialized by the taxes of all men.
Men create the tech, simp to fund hypergamy, and are taxed to death to subsidize the consequences of the modern female single life. Its a crap deal for the majority of men and I expect many men to check out in some form or another in the coming years.
Then the same females vote for politicians to draft the average men to die in the next war. All the while, females aren’t legally required to be drafted and the 1% Chads receive deferments to remain with their modern harems.
The average man is the ultimate social tool for their own oppression.
Unreal times.
“Men create the tech, simp to fund hypergamy, and are taxed to death to subsidize the consequences of the modern female single life. Its a crap deal for the majority of men and I expect many men to check out in some form or another in the coming years.”
Nailed it. But this proves the overpopulation/average guy/welfare state and dysgenics at hand.
You meet so few women who are feminine, and fewer that are young to even bother to commit to by understanding that connection will be better, the game is almost over by the time you even try to play. Overseas or nothing. And at least there, the cost of sex (time, money) is WAY less.
In the near future, most children will be reproduced by artificial sperm banks. Marriage will be a rarity in the West. Chad-bots will be the closest thing to a companion for most women. The Chad-bot will be the logical next step to add to their sex toy collection.
Seems inevitable, more and more men will leave America for foreign lands, the same way men left lands during the Exploration era.
I don’t see anything but some sort of dystopian reality for the West that looks like a hybrid of Demolition Man, 1984, Escape from New York meets I, Robot.
“Chad-bots”… Chad-GPT is coming lmao
In all seriousness, unfortunately I think your prediction is not so far fetched, especially in countries like USA.
USA is probably the biggest mental hospital of the world right now. No offense intended if you are one, but a visit to a random social media discussion between average Americans is a recipe for vicarious embarrassment at best, and hardcore misanthropy at worst.
The thing is that there aren’t too many other foreign lands to move to. 1st World Asia is also dystopian in other ways (Japan for example. They were already ahead of their time decades ago at issues we are just starting to see and feel in the West), and most of Europe, while not as bad yet, is “importing” wokism and other mind viruses from USA.
If you don’t mind to sacrifice most of the perks of a 1st World country, maybe a few South American, Eastern Europe and Asian countries with a reasonable standard living (like those of Southeast Asia) might be a choice.
4D chess post.
All these single childless women in their 30s and 40s are genetic dead ends. It’s sad that I know such woman who is successful and very intelligent, but she missed her window due to the reason you explained.
This brings to mind the case of Irish elk. Sexual selection worked with them in such way that with each succeeding generation their antlers got bigger and bigger until it got to the point where the antlers prevented them to feed themselves and the whole species “self-destructed” due to improper sexual selection strategies.
In similar way modern women are developing weird sexual strategies that lead to nowhere. They might be very intelligent, successful, and have thousands of interesting hobbies, but it’s not what the nature wants so they are opted out of the gene pool. Of course this oversimplified.
First time I read about the Irish Elk. It seems there isn’t an unanimous scientific consensus about their extinction cause (some scientist don’t believe the antlers were the main reason behind their demise), but it makes sense that those disproportionately big antlers became an inconvenience that made them more vulnerable to predators, especially prehistoric hominids.
For better or worse, humans as a whole are far from meeting the same fate of the Irish Elk, but, if the current mating patterns don’t change, I think at least some ethnicities will disappear in some regions in a matter of centuries (if mankind is still standing then) or even less than that. Certain demographics around the world are still reproducing at a high and fast rate, and if those affected by the “Irish Elk syndrome” don’t wake up, they might become unable to compete with them and get extinct or assimilated. This actually happened to some hominids such as the Neanderthals during prehistoric times who were unable to keep up with us (Homo Sapiens).
You are right but I am the same as these women. 🤔 but I am not that picky really, I could settle.
I just can’t have sex until marriage because my religious beliefs.
I chase my own imagination sometimes as well. But I am growing out of it.
The obvious solution to inceldom is for guys to RECALIBRATE their CURRENT Decile Number. Not the number they would have had in 2010, or 2000, or 1950, or 10,000 BC. (A lot of 1 dudes today would been a 10 in some specific village iat a specific time during the caveman era). It does you no good to know that you would been super high value in a different point in time. Decile numbers for the sexes change with tech. A sudden change wrecks havoc on the slow-adapters to their new Decile Number. If you wanna get technical, use “Relative Personal Stock Value” instead of decile number. For example, 150 yers ago a lot of beauty queens wound up with trolls after landing on Ellis Island. While a lot of Mid-Level guys will chase Chads until they’re unable, the same is true of Mid-Dudes who refuse to partner up long term with a really overweight gal. Both are guilty of delusion in the current dating market.
The obvious solution to inceldom is for guys to RECALIBRATE their CURRENT Decile Number. Not the number they would have had in 2010, or 2000, or 1950, or 10,000 BC. (A lot of 1 dudes today would been a 10 in some specific village at a specific time during the caveman era). It does you no good to know that you would been super high value in a different point in time. Decile numbers for the sexes change with tech. A sudden change wrecks havoc on the slow-adapters to their new Decile Number. If you wanna get technical, use “Relative Personal Stock Value” instead of decile number. For example, 150 yers ago a lot of beauty queens wound up with trolls after landing on Ellis Island. While a lot of Mid-Level girls will chase Chads until they’re unable, the same is true of Mid-Dudes who refuse to partner up long term with a really overweight gal. Both are guilty of delusion in the current dating market.
I edited the above post to girls chasing Chads lol