Lazar Angelov – Natty or Not? Can you become so muscular and aesthetic naturally?

Lazar Angelov is one of the most popular fitness models. He has thousands of followers, and many of them would be more than happy to exchange their bodies for his.

Angelov displays an aesthetic physique people would kill for.

The question is – How do you get to that level?

Is hard work all you need?

Do you have to take steroids?

Is Lazar Angelov Natty or Not?

1. Lazar Angelov looks composed in PhotoShop

Lazar’s body attracts attention. He holds a tremendous amount of muscle mass and an out of this world set of six-pack abs. His musculature just looks composed in a photo editing software such as PhotoShop.

Angelov’s skin is very thin and dry, like paper. This gives Lazar the so-called hard lean look.

Continually looking like that is not possible for natural bodybuilders. When natural bodybuilders are dry, they are also depleted.

When you are that full and lean, you are a suspect of PED usage.

Recommended article: Fake Natural Bodybuilders Have The “Photoshop” Look

2. Lazar Angelov rivals former IFBB bodybuilders in size

Lazar Angelov has the following body stats:

Lazar Angelov Is On Steroids



5’9” (175cm)


195-200lbs (88-90 kg)

Body fat:


Let’s compare Lazar Angelov to Frank Zane – a very popular bodybuilder who has won Mr.Olympia three times.


Off-season weight:

200 lbs (91kg)

Competition weight:

185lbs (83kg)


5’9” (175cm)


18” (45cm)

To summarize: Lazar Angelov has the same height as Frank Zane and is also 10+ lbs heavier.

This literally means that the current fitness models are becoming as big as former IFBB professionals who used steroids.

How do we know that the pros from the Golden Era used steroids?

During that period, steroids were legal and widely spread. It was easy to get a prescription. Moreover, every gym had a dealer. Pros like Zane, Mike Mentzer and Arnold had to use oral steroids such as Dianabol and Deca.

Recommended article: Steroids Used During The Golden Era Of Bodybuilding


3. Lazar Angelov is part of the current “natural” trend

Today, even people like Kali Muscle are claiming natural status. Kali is as big as the current Mr.Olympia Phil Heath, and yet he wants us to believe that he is a drug-free athlete. It’s a blatant lie.

The current fitness world is trying to be politically correct. This means that controversial topics are banned, whereas the critics are labeled as haters.

There are so many, supposedly, natural bodybuilders that people just can’t catch a break.

The drama gets real when the naive followers fail to acquire results similar to the ones displayed by Lazar Angelov.

They eat right and train hard, but the mirror says:

“You are not even close to Lazar Angelov’s physique.”

Genetics? Genetics are truly important in bodybuilding, but even the man with the best genetics cannot overcome his human nature.

What is the secret then?


{you decide}

References: (visited on March 13, 2014); (visited on March 13, 2014);

Disclaimer: does NOT support the usage of illegal substances. The content above is solely for informational purposes and is NOT written by a medical professional. The website is not responsible for any kind damages that may be caused by the uploaded articles – the very same way a knife seller is not responsible for the actions of his clients. Be wise – love yourself and your body.


  1. Toni

    The hight of Frank Zane is not correct in centimeters. The comparison appears to have a difference of 5 cm between him and Lazar. The hight in foot however is correct.

    Great article!

  2. Gman

    Good article… Don’t like the fact you got the heights wrong if lazar is 2inches taller he could easily be 10 lb heavier

  3. Bill b


  4. litko

    When I compare pictures of nattys before and after transformation, I can not believe that they achieved their looks without roids. Lazar Angelov looked as a usual skinny guy, you can find his pictures as non bodybuilder on the internet. He has no fantastic genetics but now he looks very impressive.


    Lazar is heavier because hes FATTER than Zane! you think those two are similar hahah just search them in google and youll see the difference! hahaha WTF Lazar on roids, hes looking normal for 6 years of working out! I can’t belive the mass of shit that comes out from this page! If you thing all the stuff that is wrote on this website you will go nowhere! There are also articles such as Steve Reeves on roids, haah pure bullshit! Also the one about RegPark and Leroy Colbert! these are the ones that you can truly belive that they were natty! If you want a modern exemple of Real Natural Bodybuilder of FItnessmodel Jeff Seid is one of them! You cant say that he looks like Zane because they have not the same skin, they dont even look the same, i could say that I have Lazars arm size, witch is a normal size, but maby i dont have the same body type, maby im fatter or leaner, and remember that the golden era bodybuilders took theyre physicque to an EXTREME level and you cant compare them to the actual fitnessmodels witch most of the photos are photoshopped!! IF YOU LISTEN TO THE STAFF WROTE ON THIS PAGE YOU WILL HAVE NO FUTURE IN BODYBUILDING.

  6. nattyderp

    Your logic in drawing conclusions based off these simple comparisons is so ridiculously flawed. There are numerous factors to account for other than measurements. One obvious one, while comparing modern-day athletes with former IFBBs, is the flippin time gap! The collective advancement of knowledge in this field- as any other- is enough to draw the obvious “people get better at doing shit over time”.
    stupid post.

  7. James

    Lazar is not that impressive. Why people think he is on roids is beyond me.
    He has a low bodyfat composition but he really doesn’t have alot of mass. He comes no were close to frank sane. Lets get angelov on a scale. Lucky if he is 180 pds

  8. Mathwiz

    Frank Zane shouldn’t be the standard which we use as a “cut off” to tell whether or not an athlete is natural. While he was on roids and fairly impressive, at 5’9, 185 lbs, 5% bodyfat, he only had an FFMI of around 26. While this is high, easily over the broscience “limit” of 25, several known natural bodybuilders in early bodybuilding history have surpassed it, with Jack Delinger hitting an FFMI over 28 in 1949 and George Eifferman hitting around 27.7 in 1948. These and other high numbers were obtained before steroids were even available to the public, before Russians even gave steroids to their Olympic team. Likewise, these were before leg development was emphasized in bodybuilding to the degree it is now, so these people may have been able to attain higher levels of physical development than even then. Now, your current numbers list Lazar at 200 pounds at 5’9 and 5% bodyfat. This would put him at an FFMI of around 28, which is hard to achieve, but believable because of the above examples. However, other sources, such as SimplyShredded and HealthyCeleb put him at 5’11” and 195 lbs, which at a bodyfat percentage of 5%, would put him at an FFMI of 25.87 – which is well under previous natural achievements. At the end of the day, he may be natural, even though it is way easier for him to be where he is with the help of steroids.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *